Governance,
Risk & Compliance

Build compliance into the way your organization operates.

Cybersecurity and compliance cannot be solved by completing a questionnaire once a year.

Organizations increasingly face requirements from regulators, customers, insurance carriers, funders and grantmakers, business partners, and government contracts. Meeting those requirements takes more than technology. It requires documented controls, policies, evidence, accountability, risk management, and ongoing remediation.

Frontline helps organizations build practical Governance, Risk & Compliance programs designed to move from assessment to readiness, and to stay there.

Readiness and alignment, not certification.

Where formal certification or an independent third-party assessment is required, Frontline can help prepare the environment, documentation, and supporting evidence for the appropriate assessor.

Frontline can assist organizations working toward or aligning with:

  • CMMC Level 2
  • NIST SP 800-171
  • NIST SP 800-53
  • NIST Cybersecurity Framework
  • NIST AI Risk Management Framework
  • HIPAA Security requirements
  • CIS Controls
  • Customer, vendor, and funder security requirements
  • Cyber-insurance security requirements
  • Internal security and governance standards

A program begins with an accurate picture of the environment.

We translate those findings into a prioritized path forward, not simply a list of deficiencies.

Frontline can perform:

  • Cybersecurity and compliance assessments
  • Control reviews
  • Risk assessments
  • Gap assessments
  • Technical environment reviews
  • Documentation reviews
  • Policy reviews
  • Evidence collection and validation
  • Readiness assessments

Controls have to be documented, implemented, and maintained.

Compliance requires more than having security controls in place. Organizations also need to demonstrate that their security and governance practices hold up over time.

Depending on the engagement, Frontline can assist with the development and maintenance of:

  • System Security Plans (SSPs)
  • Plans of Action & Milestones (POA&Ms)
  • Written Information Security Programs (WISPs)
  • Acceptable Use Policies
  • Information Security Policies
  • Access-control policies
  • Incident-response policies
  • Business continuity and recovery policies
  • Vendor-management policies
  • Data-handling policies
  • Employee AI-use policies
  • AI governance policies
  • Onboarding and offboarding procedures
  • Technology standards and runbooks

We don’t have to stop after telling you what is wrong.

This is an important difference in the Frontline model. When an assessment identifies technical deficiencies, Frontline can work with your organization to remediate them.

  • Identity and access improvements
  • Multifactor authentication
  • Endpoint security
  • Network segmentation
  • Logging and monitoring
  • Backup and recovery
  • Cloud-security configuration
  • Microsoft 365 security improvements
  • Vulnerability remediation
  • Device management
  • Documentation and standardization
  • Security tooling implementation
  • Infrastructure modernization

Frontline brings decades of combined senior-level experience across MSP operations, cybersecurity, project management, systems engineering, infrastructure, and technology leadership. That allows governance decisions to be connected directly to the technical environment they are intended to protect.

Frontline approaches GRC as a continuous cycle.

Instead of rebuilding the compliance program before every audit, customer review, or renewal, organizations can maintain their documentation, evidence, risks, controls, and remediation plans throughout the year.

01

Assess

02

Document

03

Prioritize

04

Remediate

05

Validate

06

Govern

07

Improve

The cycle repeats. Readiness is maintained, not rebuilt.

What an ongoing GRC relationship can include:

  • Governance and compliance platform management
  • Risk-register maintenance
  • Control tracking
  • Evidence management
  • Policy management
  • POA&M management
  • Remediation tracking
  • Executive reporting
  • Scheduled governance meetings
  • Framework readiness reviews
  • Security-policy updates
  • Vendor-risk review
  • AI-governance oversight
  • Audit and assessor preparation

Four ways this relationship works.

Compliance should be a managed process,
not an annual emergency.